Startup Planning: A Practical Guide - From Problem Definition to the Business Model Canvas
The Starting Point of Business Planning
- What business planning is: The capability to develop research and analysis skills, and to classify and analyze collected data according to the planning purpose, then document it in numbers and charts
- References: 『The Art of Service Planning』(co-author), 『AI Business Theory』·『101 Business Model Stories』(co-author)
- Final goal: Complete 1 AI-based business plan
The core is these three:
- What business planning is: It's not about "what to make" but about "whose what problem to solve"
- The difference between technology and business: Technology asks "can it be made?", business asks "is there someone who will pay?"
- Slogan: "Good services don't start with ideas - they start with problems"
Finding Problems Instead of Ideas
Why you shouldn't start with ideas
| Order | Flow | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Idea first | Idea → Build → Find customers | "Who uses this?" - mostly fails |
| Problem first | Problem → Confirm customers → Build | "When can I get this?" - people are waiting |
The conclusion: "Ideas are cheap, problems are valuable." Problems where people are frustrated will find you if you go looking.
Good starting points (3), dangerous starting points (3)
- Good starting points: Something I've experienced (most reliable) · Others' complaints (a 1-star review = a signal of a problem) · Something I'm already struggling with (Excel, manual work = an opportunity)
- Dangerous starting points: "Because AI is trendy" (customers disappear) · "It doesn't exist yet" (there's a reason it doesn't exist) · "Everyone can use it" (no one actually uses it)
Frustration shows up in behavior, not just words
- Just tolerating it - familiar frustration is the biggest opportunity
- Working around it in weird ways (Excel, KakaoTalk "send to self") - workarounds are evidence of a problem
- Spending more money or time - a signal of willingness to pay
- Giving up entirely - the biggest market sits where people gave up
Three discovery questions: "Is this supposed to take this long?" · "Why are you still doing this by hand?" · "When was the last time you got angry about this?" TIP - Instead of "What do you need?", ask "When was the last time you were frustrated?"
Three Lenses
Time ("Why does this take so long?") · Effort ("Why isn't someone doing this?") · Emotion ("Where are you feeling anxious and annoyed?") - Services are born where time is being wasted, repetitive labor is AI's domain, and eliminating anxiety makes people pay.
One-sentence problem definition formula
Who + When/In what situation + Because of what + What harm they suffer
Example: "A 3-year solo apartment dweller doesn't know what's left in the fridge on the way home from work, ends up ordering delivery, and throws away ingredients they saved over the weekend" - all four elements are there, so the solution becomes visible.
4 questions to judge if it's a "solvable problem"
Real existence (3+ concrete people) · Happens frequently (weekly or more recommended) · Has a workaround · Can the effect be described in one line as time/money/mind relief. 3 types to avoid: Too big ("solve youth unemployment") · Only I experience it · Already well-solved ("it's hard to catch a taxi")
Customer Understanding and Personas
The customer might not be one person
| Role | Definition | Key point |
|---|---|---|
| User | The person actually using it with their hands | Experiences the frustration directly |
| Buyer | The person opening their wallet | Most sensitive to price |
| Decider | The person approving "let's use this" | Most important in B2B |
Example: A children's learning app - parents are the buyer; a company collaboration tool - team leads/executives are the decider; a college group project app - all three are the same person.
4 criteria for segmenting customers - stronger as you go down
WEAK Demographics ("20s female" is weak) · NORMAL Job/role ("1-cafe owner") · STRONG Situation/context ("3 days before closing" = the "when" from earlier) · STRONGEST Behavior habit ("manages with Excel" = evidence they're tolerating it)
4-step funnel to narrow the target
Total market (50 million) → Role (living alone, ~7.5 million) → Situation (after-work solo apartment dweller at 10 PM, hundreds of thousands - the moment they turn it on) → One person (2-year solo apartment dweller Kim Min-su (22) = persona).
"Isn't 1 person too small?" - There are hundreds of thousands of people like Kim Min-su. Satisfy one person well and similar people will follow; aim for everyone and you'll catch nothing. The narrowed targets share a common time constraint ("3 months into fitness," "night before a presentation") - people in a hurry become your first customers.
7-cell persona template
Definition: A fictional character representing one key customer, written as if they're a real person with a name, situation, daily routine, and frustrations. "20-30s male/female smartphone user" type summaries are statistics, not personas.
| Cell | Content |
|---|---|
| 01 Name/Age | Must use a fake name |
| 02 Job/Role | Daily routine should be imaginable |
| 03 Daily routine | The activation moment comes from here |
| 04 Frustrations experienced | In this person's own words, from the problem defined earlier |
| 05 How they're tolerating it now | If skipped, the problem is weak |
| 06 Desired outcome | Not features - results |
| 07 One-liner quote | The strongest line for presentations |
4 common mistakes: Listing statistics · Creating an ideal type · No visuals · Pre-solving - only write the problem, save the solution for value proposition. Test: "I know someone like this" = success, "Who are you talking about?" = insufficient. 3 principles: Real person · No solutions yet · Only 1 number.
Market and Competitive Service Analysis
SESSION 1 - How to look at the market
| Stage | Question | Nature |
|---|---|---|
| TAM (Total market) | How big is this entire field? | Credibility |
| SAM (Target market) | Which range within that does our customer belong to? | Direction - plug in persona conditions |
| SOM (Serviceable obtainable market) | What can we realistically capture in 1 year? | Planning - most important in planning |
TAM is for credibility, SAM is for direction, SOM is for planning - you need all three to be persuasive. Forbidden phrases: "The market is huge" · "Even if we capture just 1%" · "There are no competitors" - all sound like "no research done."
Formula: Number of customers × Amount per person × Number of times. Numbers need sources; if none, label as "estimate." 4 research methods: Public statistics (Statistics Korea etc.) · App reviews (1-2 star reviews are the best data) · Community searches · Try using it directly.
SESSION 2 - 3 types of competitors and 6-item comparison table
Starting point is the persona's "how they're tolerating it now" - if they search YouTube then open a delivery app, those two are competitors.
| Type | Definition · Key point |
|---|---|
| Direct competitor | Same customers, same method, same problem - easy to find, e.g., recipe recommendation app |
| Indirect competitor | Different method solving the same problem - easy to miss but actually the strongest, e.g., delivery app, meal kit |
| Just tolerating it | Doing nothing and putting up with it - hardest to beat, where many new entrants come from |
Competitors take the customer's time and money - everything. The comparison table needs at least 2 types. 4-step finding: Pull from "how they're tolerating it" → Search using the customer's own words → Deduce 1 direct, 1 indirect, 1 tolerating → Try using them directly.
6 comparison items: Name/type · 1 core feature · Price · What they're good at · What's lacking · Where we win. Item 05 "What's lacking" is the core - our service is born here. Item 04 must also be filled for trust, and the judgment standard is your persona's taste, not your own preference.
SESSION 3 - 3 conditions for differentiation, positioning map, one-sentence formula
"Better" is not a differentiation - everyone says the same thing, there's no standard, and there's no reason to switch.
| Condition | Question | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Specificity | Can you say it with numbers/situation? | "Convenient" ✕ → "Done in 3 minutes" ○ |
| Customer value | Is it something the persona would care about? | "Latest AI technology" ✕ → "No need to go to the store" ○ |
| Competitive advantage | Are competitors not doing this right now? | Must pass all three to be a differentiation |
Positioning map: 2 axes → plot competitors → find empty space. Good axes: price, speed, expertise, preparation burden, usage frequency. Bad axes: good↔bad types. Note: an empty space isn't automatically an opportunity - it might be empty because "nobody wants it," so ask "why is it empty?"
Formula: ① For whom ② In what situation ③ Differently from competitors ④ What we do - numbers make it stronger. 4 common mistakes: No competitors (tolerating is also a competitor) · Market too big (focus on SOM) · Boasting features (translate into benefit) · Putting others down (acknowledge strengths first) - the common thread is not talking about the customer.
Making the Value Proposition
Features vs. value - distinguished by the subject
If the subject is "service" it's a feature; if the subject is "customer" it's value. Customers don't buy features - they buy a different day.
- Feature: "AI recognizes photos and recommends recipes" → Value: "No need to go to the store, dinner is solved and less money is wasted"
- Feature: "Automatically predicts order quantities with data" → Value: "Ordering time disappears, so you can leave work early"
3 shapes of value
Value is the flip side of the lenses we saw earlier. Time (gives it back) · Effort (gives some back) · Emotion (makes it easier) - don't say all three, pick the biggest pain point and emphasize it large.
Value proposition canvas 6 cells
- Our side: Product/service · Pain killer · Gain maker
- Customer side: Job to be done · Pain · Gain
Order: Customer side first (moved from the 7-cell persona) → pair pain with pain killer. 3 check questions: Is every feature paired? · Does it directly address the biggest pain? · Is this pairing better than competitors?
Core one-liner message - 3 formula types
| Formula | Form | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A Pain removal type | "No longer [pain]" | "Fridge ingredients - don't throw them away anymore." |
| B Result promise type | "Just [action], then [result]" | "One photo, and 10 minutes later dinner is done." |
| C Target designation type | "For [who], [value]" | "Fridge savior for people who can't cook - for solo apartment dwellers." |
Rules: Around 20 characters · No jargon · Customer as subject. Words to delete: AI-based, smart, platform, innovation, convenient, best. 30-second pitch: Who → what pain → our solution → one-liner finish.
Understanding the Business Model Canvas
Business model = 5 questions
For whom → Customer segments · What → Value proposition · How delivered → Channels/customer relationships · What it costs → Resources/activities/partners/costs · What it earns → Revenue streams. Definition: A way of drawing how a business runs on one page, a tool for assuming, testing, and revising based on evidence - Osterwalder & Pigneur, 『Business Model Generation』(2010).
9 cells and the order to fill them
| No. | Cell | Question asked |
|---|---|---|
| ① | Customer segments | For whom? |
| ② | Value proposition | What do we give? |
| ③ | Channels | How do we reach them? |
| ④ | Customer relationships | How do we keep them? |
| ⑤ | Revenue streams | Who pays? |
| ⑥ | Key resources | What must we absolutely have? |
| ⑦ | Key activities | What must we absolutely be good at? |
| ⑧ | Key partners | With whom? |
| ⑨ | Cost structure | Where does the money go? |
Fill the right side (customer side) first, left side later. ① comes from the earlier persona, ② from the value proposition one-liner, and ⑤⑨ show "is this a profitable business?"
7 revenue stream types
Asset sales (Coupang) · Usage fees (-) · Subscription (Netflix, Wow) · Rental/leasing (-) · Licensing (-) · Intermediary fees (Baemin, Airbnb, Toss) · Advertising (KakaoTalk, Baemin). Mixing types is common.
6 case examples - user ≠ payer
| Service | Who pays | Revenue type |
|---|---|---|
| Baedal Minjok | Restaurant owners + member customers | Intermediary fees · Advertising |
| KakaoTalk (neighborhood) | Residents free, local stores/advertisers | Advertising |
| Toss | Stores · financial companies · financial customers | Fees · interest |
| Netflix | Viewer pays directly monthly | Subscription |
| Airbnb | Host + guest both | Intermediary fees |
| Coupang | Buying customers + marketplace sellers | Sales · subscription · fees |
Key point: Baemin takes money from stores (9.8% fee), Coupang's biggest cost is logistics, and Airbnb's key asset isn't buildings - it's "trust (reviews)."
Concretizing the Business Model
The final step is rewriting one-word cells like "advertising" / "?" / "server costs."
4 questions for revenue streams
"Making money from ads" isn't a revenue structure. Who (the payer) · For what (what value is priced) · How much (price) · How (method) - if any is missing, it's under-specified. Example: "A neighborhood side-dish store pays monthly for the 'ingredient recommendation' spot next to recipes."
Real numbers: Baemin delivery fee 9.8% (2024.7~) · Wow monthly 7,890 won · Airbnb host-only 15.5%. Finding: 2+ revenue streams are standard, numbers change yearly so the canvas is a living document.
Rough 1-year revenue calculation
Payer count × amount per payment × number of payments per year = 1-year revenue. Example (assumed): 20 stores × 50,000 won/month × 12 = 12 million won. If insufficient, add more revenue streams or grow customers.
The left 4 cells are a value chain
② Value proposition → ⑦ Key activities → ⑥ Key resources → ⑧ Key partners → ⑨ Cost structure. When value changes, the left 4 change together - Coupang's logistics becoming the biggest cost because of "fast delivery" value is the example.
Make it or partner for it?
Make directly = key activities (the heart of value, e.g., Coupang operating delivery itself) · Partner = key partners (what others do better, e.g., Airbnb accommodations are hosts, Baemin food is restaurants). Judgment question: "If someone else does this, would customers still choose us?" - If yes, partner.
Cost structure - fixed vs. variable
| Basket | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed costs | Money going out every month even with 0 customers | Personnel, office, basic server |
| Variable costs | Money that grows as customers grow | AI usage fees, payment processing fees |
Examples: Coupang logistics centers (fixed) + delivery fees (variable), Baemin system (fixed) + rider/payment fees (variable). Trap: If variable cost per transaction exceeds revenue per transaction, more customers means more loss - check first.
Weak cells - 5 signals
- Revenue stream is one word ("ads") → unpack with the 4 questions
- Partner cell is "?" → "What we can't do" is the partner
- 10+ activities → keep only the heart 3
- Costs are just "server" → minimum 4 fixed + variable
- Value and costs are separate → connect them as a chain
Direct quote from the material - "Finding weak cells isn't failure. Finding them now means you can fix them most cheaply."
The full flow, in one line
Problem discovery → Customer understanding → Market/competition → Value proposition → Canvas → Concretization - this is the sequence that produces a complete business plan.
| This is | Its material |
|---|---|
| Problem definition · "how they're tolerating it" | "Frustration" behavior signals · competitor list |
| Persona · differentiation | ① Segments · value proposition |
| One-liner message · canvas draft | ② Value proposition · concretization |
Core formulas and matching at a glance
Starting with the formula clusters:
- Problem definition: Who · When/in what situation · Because of what · What harm
- Market size: Number of customers × amount per person × times
- 1-year revenue: Payer count × amount per payment × times per year
- Differentiation one-liner: For whom · In what situation · Differently from competitors · What we do
- 7 revenue types: Asset sales · Usage fees · Subscription · Rental/leasing · Licensing · Intermediary fees · Advertising
- 4 revenue questions: Who · For what · How much · How
- BMC 9 cells: Customer segments · Value proposition · Channels · Customer relationships · Revenue streams · Key resources · Key activities · Key partners · Cost structure (right side first)
One-line matching summary:
- TAM is credibility, SAM is direction, SOM is planning
- Competitors are direct · indirect · just tolerating - indirect is actually strongest
- "Better" isn't differentiation - specificity · customer value · competitive advantage
- If the subject is service it's a feature; if customer it's value
- User ≠ payer (KakaoTalk: residents free, stores pay for ads)
- Heart is made directly, the rest goes to partners
- If variable cost per transaction exceeds revenue per transaction, more customers means loss
Concept matching self-quiz
Answer in 10 seconds to pass.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| If technology is "can it be made?", then business is? | "Is there someone who will pay?" |
| What type does "just boiling ramen and eating it" fall under? | Just tolerating it - the type where many new entrants come from |
| The market stage we can actually capture within 1 year? | SOM |
| Among the 4 customer criteria, the strongest is? | Behavior habit (how they're tolerating it now) |
| "One photo, and 10 minutes later dinner is done" is? | B Result promise type |
| From a recipe app's perspective, a delivery app is? | Indirect competitor |
| The most important cell in the comparison table? | ⑤ What's lacking |
| Money going out every month even with 0 customers? | Fixed costs |
Final checklist
Going down from the top, you can check the entire flow at once.
- Starting point - business planning definition, technology vs. business difference
- Problem finding - 3+3 starting points, 4 behavior signals, 3 lenses, problem definition formula, 4 judgment questions
- Customer/persona - 3 customer faces, 4 criteria, 4-step funnel, 7-cell persona, 4 mistakes
- Market/competition - TAM/SAM/SOM, 4 research methods, 3 competitor types, 6 comparison items, 3 differentiation conditions, map, one-sentence formula
- Value proposition - features vs. value (by subject), 3 value shapes, 6-cell canvas · pairing, 3 one-liner formulas
- Canvas - 5 questions, 9 cells, 7 revenue types, 6 case examples matched
- Concretization - 4 revenue questions, revenue formula, chain, activities vs. partners, fixed/variable, 5 weak-cell signals
In the end, one tip per line with one example each will be enough.

